A Comparative Look at Religion and Catastrophic Global Warming
In 1 Samuel 23, David consults the Lord with the help of a device called an "Ephod," through which the Lord answers David’s questions about what he should do regarding battle plans. The Ephod is apparently in the safekeeping of a priest named Abiathar at the time.
In "An Inconvenient Truth" former Vice President Al Gore consults his own "Ephod" of sorts, in the guise of Global Climate Models, in order to spread the Gospel of Global Warming. This "Ephod" is kept by Al Gore’s own version of a "high priest," James Hansen, who runs the Goddard Institute for Space Studies over at NASA.
Sound familiar?
When Al Gore goes on tour, telling us all how we have to change the way we’re living or disaster will befall us, he sounds more and more like a prophet of doom from the Bible. We must repent of our Carbon sins, lest the great Climate Change God strike us down with flood, famine, drought, and all manner of disaster. And by repent, Al means pay for indulgences in the form of "Carbon Credits."
Al is also training disciples to spread this belief - just as Jesus did before him by sending out 70 of his followers, Al is sending out thousands to spread the word about Carbon, and how only by following his teachings (not his example, of course - he needs his private jet, his stretch SUVs, his 20 room mansion, to spread the word, don’t you know) can we avoid disaster.
And every time some "tipping point" is passed, but doom does not follow - every season hurricanes do not increase, sea levels do not rise, temperatures remain flat - we are told that it is coming. Really! Ignore those who say otherwise - those heretics, agents of Carbon (Satan?) who are only working for their own enrichment. It will be a disaster in fifty or a hundred years (long after Al and his cohorts have made billions in Cap and Trade and Alternative Energy subsidies). Trust them, it IS coming!
Changing their story at every turn, assuring us that Universal (or at least Worldwide) Armageddon will be upon us, and using mystical means to "prove" it (every one-off is treated as a harbinger of doom, even if the one-off is a record cold snap or a drop in the rate of sea-level rise), they continue to scare young children into proper "behavior" and "reverence" for "Scientific Consensus."
Don’t think for a moment that they are doing it for the money, though. Only evil agents of Carbon do it for the money. Ignore the $32 billion spent for climate research since 1989 - research that has, purely coincidentally, mostly come to the conclusion that Global Warming is real, is man made, and needs MORE research. And that $36 billion spent on "climate related technologies?" That could never, ever taint "the science." The $20 million spent by Evil Oil for researching possible alternative theories, however, places every "denier" on the payroll of Satan!
Again, think about religions - we all know that we have to pay the preacher! Of course, Al Gore preaches for "speaking fees." You’d think if he truly believed, he’d be more like Paul, who preached for room and board. Al seems to be more like Jim Baker….
"All praise to the prophet, death to the non-believing heretic, obedience or disaster, doubt is not allowed, and don’t confuse the argument with the facts!"
Sounds like a religion to me!
OBC - Obama Broadcasting Company
ABC TURNS PROGRAMMING OVER TO OBAMA; NEWS TO BE ANCHORED FROM INSIDE WHITE HOUSE
Tue Jun 16 2009 08:45:10 ET
On the night of June 24, the media and government become one, when ABC turns its programming over to President Obama and White House officials to push government run health care — a move that has ignited an ethical firestorm!
Highlights on the agenda:
ABCNEWS anchor Charlie Gibson will deliver WORLD NEWS from the Blue Room of the White House.
The network plans a primetime special — ‘Prescription for America’ — originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.
The Director of Communications at the White House Office of Health Reform is Linda Douglass, who worked as a reporter for ABC News from 1998-2006.
Late Monday night, Republican National Committee Chief of Staff Ken McKay fired off a complaint to the head of ABCNEWS:
Dear Mr. Westin:
As the national debate on health care reform intensifies, I am deeply concerned and disappointed with ABC’s astonishing decision to exclude opposing voices on this critical issue on June 24, 2009. Next Wednesday, ABC News will air a primetime health care reform “town hall” at the White House with President Barack Obama. In addition, according to an ABC News report, GOOD MORNING AMERICA, WORLD NEWS, NIGHTLINE and ABC’s web news “will all feature special programming on the president’s health care agenda.” This does not include the promotion, over the next 9 days, the president’s health care agenda will receive on ABC News programming.
Today, the Republican National Committee requested an opportunity to add our Party’s views to those of the President’s to ensure that all sides of the health care reform debate are presented. Our request was rejected. I believe that the President should have the ability to speak directly to the America people. However, I find it outrageous that ABC would prohibit our Party’s opposing thoughts and ideas from this national debate, which affects millions of ABC viewers.
In the absence of opposition, I am concerned this event will become a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda. If that is the case, this primetime infomercial should be paid for out of the DNC coffers. President Obama does not hold a monopoly on health care reform ideas or on free airtime. The President has stated time and time again that he wants a bipartisan debate. Therefore, the Republican Party should be included in this primetime event, or the DNC should pay for your airtime.
Respectfully,
Ken McKay
Republican National Committee
Chief of Staff
MORE
ABCNEWS Senior Vice President Kerry Smith on Tuesday responded to the RNC complaint, saying it contained ‘false premises’:
"ABCNEWS prides itself on covering all sides of important issues and asking direct questions of all newsmakers — of all political persuasions — even when others have taken a more partisan approach and even in the face of criticism from extremes on both ends of the political spectrum. ABCNEWS is looking for the most thoughtful and diverse voices on this issue.
"ABCNEWS alone will select those who will be in the audience asking questions of the president. Like any programs we broadcast, ABC News will have complete editorial control. To suggest otherwise is quite unfair to both our journalists and our audience."
Developing…
-FROM THE The Drudge Report
Force the EPA’s Hand….
So the EPA wants to declare Green House Gas Emissions as "dangerous" and begin to exert regulatory controls over them. Many "greenies" see this as a wonderful development and an opportunity to finally do something about "Climate Change," which they no longer call "Global Warming" because, let’s face it, the Globe isn’t.
My take on this is - sue. Sue the EPA into the ground. But not the way most people who know me might expect. I’m not saying we sue the EPA to PREVENT these regulations. Oh no, I’m saying we go the complete opposite direction. We force the EPA to regulate - and I mean REALLY regulate - all sources of "Greenhouse Gasses." We sue every time they announce a regulation that only affects one source - we force their hand. If cars are a significant source of GHGs, we make them regulate wood stoves, HVAC systems, coal and oil burning power plants, manufacturers - EVERYONE.
"Madness!" you might say? The only way to get the American people to reject this absurd idea that somehow Carbon Dioxide is destroying the Climate is to show them how painful it will be for everyone if we all have to stop using it - and what it’s going to cost us to do so! Better the short-term pain that such actions will cause than the long term, slow creep of regulation and "tax-and-steal" carbon trading programs.
Duct Tape is Appropriate - NoH8 Beauty Queen Campaign
"No H8" Campaign Shows Gagged Beauty Queens
I think this is so appropriate! If you have anything "bad" to say, Duct Tape your mouth shut, because the Liberals don’t want to hear it! It doesn’t matter what you truly believe, or whether you express it in a respectful and thoughtful manner. To utter any word against the Liberal Agenda is "H8!"
If they understood how intolerant this campaign makes them look - how ignorant this behavior is - they’d probably be appalled that they let themselves be used this way.
In light of the recent Miss California / Miss USA debacle, it is very appropriate that these girls have taped their mouths shut. Perhaps they can keep from giving equally uninformed opinions on other subjects!
Carrie Prejean - Finally a Daughter to be Proud Of!
Miss California, Carrie Prajean, is involved in a sex scandal, but this is one her parents can feel proud about! When asked about her personal feelings on "Gay Marriage" at the Miss USA 2009 competition, Carrie gave an honest answer! Her answer ignited a firestorm of rebuke and ultimately cost her the Miss USA crown.
Apparently, it’s not all right to voice opinions that the judges in such a contest don’t agree with. It wouldn’t have mattered if she had spoken with the "tongues of angels" on the subject, because the judge who asked the question didn’t get the answer he wanted. He was supposed to be judging the manner, demeanor, and thoughtfulness of her response. Instead, he judged the content - giving her a score of zero.
And now the Left is in full-throated frenzy, behaving as if Miss Prejean had advocated rounding up gays and shoving them into the ovens at Auschwitz. Strike that. They are behaving as if she were actually doing the rounding up and the shoving in herself! Case in point is Alan Duncan, MP in the UK, who made the outrageous statement "If you read that Miss California has been murdered, you will know it was me, won’t you?"
Now, it has come down to death threats! For voicing a simple opinion shared by over half of the residents of California. It is the popular opinion, if not the politically correct one. And for her outspoken statement of her own personal belief, the "tolerant" left has decided she not only deserves to be called names, not only to be re-educated, but to be killed!
Mr. and Mrs. Prejean, I hope you are as proud of your daughter as I am. She is a brave, savvy lady who knew her answer was probably going to cost her, but she gave it anyway. She truly won this particular test of character, even if the actual crown went to somebody else.
When You Can’t Fail….
I guess it had to happen. Banks are "too big to fail." GM is "too big to fail." And now, in an era of Government bailing everyone else, student egos are simply "too big to fail."
Apparently the school systems are prepping the next batch of "bailout babies" who will need to be coddled through their entire lives - and doing it on our dime. They’re telling kids that there’s no such thing as a "failing" grade - they can "make up" homework, demonstrate some "partial" mastery of a subject, basically can get through life without worrying about failure.
Unfortunately, this means when they get jobs, they’ll expect the same coddling. Don’t show up for work on time? No problem - we’ll "hold" your work for you, so that you can still get it done. Don’t pay your bills? The Government is going to put a hold on your credit score, no doubt, so that it doesn’t suffer. I mean, these are the only "fair" things to do once you’ve spent 16 years of schooling telling the kids they "can’t" fail - we won’t LET them fail!
This is, of course, complete and utter bull manure. How long do you think society can afford to subsidize, bail out, or prop-up those who refuse to get the message that the only true rode to success is hard-work and nurturing the talents you have? We’re already nursing trillion dollar deficits and tens of trillions in debt over the next 8 years. The whole system will collapse, and these kids will have to face the real world. Who’s fault is it if they can’t handle "failure?"
The Heights Of Hypocrisy
Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House of Representatives, recently testified before a Congressional subcommittee that a proposed Cap and Trade bill would punish Americans with higher Energy Costs. Which, of course, is the point of Cap and Trade - to make Carbon Based Energy less "cost effective" by pricing it in such a way that people prefer "alternative" energy sources. These "alternatives" are always much more expensive than Carbon based energy, and that’s the point of increasing the cost of carbon!
"Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman of California accused Gingrich of trying to scare people into opposing action on climate change. Waxman argued the bill is designed to contain energy cost increases."
First, I find it hypocritical that Rep. Waxman would try to paint Gingrich as a fear-monger. The entire Cap and Trade Industry is based on fear mongering. We have only a few short moments to save the planet, and this is one way of doing it!
But wait, now there’s more! We can do it in a way that doesn’t cost anyone anything! Yes, prices will go up, but these Cap and Trade schemes are revenue neutral - that is, the Government will collect higher taxes and fees on polluters - the EVIL polluters will pass that cost onto their customers (the American Citizens) - and the beneficent Government will then hand out rebate checks to the citizenry to help offset what the Evil Polluters are charging them!
There’s just one catch….if Energy Costs don’t change - why should I pay more for solar or wind than I do for my subsidized Carbon Based energy?
Earth Day Predictions : Beware! The Sky IS Falling!
In the spirit of Earth Day, I’ve copied these predictions from renowned speakers on Earth Day - Take Head, World, we are DOOMED!
“We have about five more years at the outside to do something.”
• Kenneth Watt, ecologist
“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
• George Wald, Harvard Biologist
“We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.”
• Barry Commoner, Washington University biologist
(more…)
President da Silva: Why Should I Suffer?
"As Mr Brown looked on during a press conference, Mr Lula da Silva said that action was urgent since it would be intolerable for the poor — who were blameless for the collapse of financial markets — to suffer the most from its effects." [source]
Remind anywone else of the Joke from "Fiddler on the Roof?"
Tevye: And Reb Nahum, the beggar . . .
Nahum: Alms for the poor, alms for the poor.
Lazar: Here, Reb Nahum, is one kopek.
Nahum: One kopek? Last week you gave me two kopeks.
Lazar: I had a bad week.
Nahum: So if you had a bad week, why should I suffer?
