So the EPA wants to declare Green House Gas Emissions as "dangerous" and begin to exert regulatory controls over them.  Many "greenies" see this as a wonderful development and an opportunity to finally do something about "Climate Change," which they no longer call "Global Warming" because, let’s face it, the Globe isn’t.

My take on this is - sue.  Sue the EPA into the ground.  But not the way most people who know me might expect.  I’m not saying we sue the EPA to PREVENT these regulations.  Oh no, I’m saying we go the complete opposite direction.  We force the EPA to regulate - and I mean REALLY regulate - all sources of "Greenhouse Gasses."  We sue every time they announce a regulation that only affects one source - we force their hand.  If cars are a significant source of GHGs, we make them regulate wood stoves, HVAC systems, coal and oil burning power plants, manufacturers - EVERYONE.

"Madness!" you might say? The only way to get the American people to reject this absurd idea that somehow Carbon Dioxide is destroying the Climate is to show them how painful it will be for everyone if we all have to stop using it - and what it’s going to cost us to do so!  Better the short-term pain that such actions will cause than the long term, slow creep of regulation and "tax-and-steal" carbon trading programs.